心字_成灰吧 关注:116贴子:2,817
  • 5回复贴,共1

Moveover,Montgomery's account

只看楼主收藏回复

Moveover,Montgomery's account suggests that there are universally agreed medical ethical principles, whereas such principles differ both across and within jurisdictions, and also evolve time. Religious and cultural perspectives have important practical effects on biomedical principles. So, for example, a concept such as the sanctity of life is commonly respected by different faith groups, and is inherent in legal frameworks across jurisdictions. But sanctity of life can mean very different things when applied in practice. Its application is predicted upon agreement as to what life means and when it begins and ends.In addition, while the principles may be agreed in general, the extent to which it is amenable to exceptions may vary considerably.


IP属地:江苏来自iPhone客户端1楼2017-10-25 18:21回复
    The rise of ethics consciousness in turn has been driven at least initially by engagement of health care professionals with biomedical ethical concepts, and less by the law. Certainly professional ethical tenets existed centuries before the recent development of biomedical ethics. One of the earliest statements of such a professional code was that of the Hippocratic Oath in Ancient Greece, one provision of which, exhorting health professionals to keep their patients' secrets, resonates throughout health care professional codes in the Western world today.


    IP属地:江苏来自iPhone客户端2楼2017-10-25 20:09
    回复
      This is an interesting development as such engagement has undoubtedly helped to frame the manner in which health professionals self-regulate through the evolution of professional ethical codes. Thus biomedical ethics translates into professional ethics. Such professional ethical standards can ultimately affect health care law, in the evolution of legal standards. Biomedical ethicists today sit on ethics committees of medical professional regulatory bodies, assisting in the development of those professional guidelines.


      IP属地:江苏来自iPhone客户端3楼2017-10-25 20:09
      回复
        There is undoubtedly an interface between professional biomedical ethics and health law. Jose Miola talks of a symbiotic relationship. Coggon argues that there is also an interface between academic medical law and academic medical ethics. Although their approaches and analytical concers differ, both have developed in response to particular questions such as how, and why, should medical practices be governed. Each informs the other. The conclusions they reach are often strikingly similar and are reflected in laws, regulations, guidance, and even dominant professional norms and mores. Equally, rather than academic medical ethics, others take the view that the better terminology should be health care ethics or health ethics.


        IP属地:江苏来自iPhone客户端4楼2017-10-25 20:09
        回复
          6.State the
          sides of the“nature-nurture"debate.In what
          tWo
          important way are nature and nurture not opposed to each other?(第5
          章p89).
          7.Explain Erving Goffman's idea that we engage in a“presentation of
          self".What are the elements of this presentation? Apply this approach
          to an analysis of a student attending a class in the classroom.(第6 章
          p109).
          differ from
          8.What is primary group? How do
          primary groups
          secondary groups? Give examples of each in your own life.(第7 章


          IP属地:江苏来自iPhone客户端5楼2017-11-20 11:45
          回复
            6.说明“自然养育”辩论的双方。自然与培育不是相互对立的重要方式?
            7.阐述欧文·戈夫曼(Erving Goffman)关于我们从事“自我展示”的想法。本演示文稿的内容是什么?将这种方法应用于对课堂上学生进行分析。
            8.什么是主组? 主要小组如何做次要小组? 给自己生活中的每一个例子。


            IP属地:江苏6楼2017-11-20 11:48
            回复