因为我们这边的本原不是在对事象吧而是对个人开炮

两个问题第一人要为自己的言论负责既然想要当中立党就不要发出那种单纯的人面一套人后一套的话
第二点他们的地图炮已经开到把我们这些单纯看戏的人给包括了，我们为什么要忍气吞声

对个人开炮的找个人去，别再殃及我们吧了啦！！！
他们的地图炮已经开到把你们这些单纯看戏的人给包括了，你们的地图炮已经开到把我们这些单纯看戏的人给包括了 ！！！！！
地图炮大家都别开了，都停下吧！！！！！！！

我也是半路跳出来的啊。。。。。

我知道很多都是给卷进去的，我也是一个，所以说：
对个人开炮的找个人去！

一，要不就将那些人战翻，看来没人能做到
二，承认自己的错误，但也要指出喷人者的不对，也不必要全盘否定自己
三，什么也不做，等事情冷下去。
因为这不是现实中的对话，在网上是有记录的。各种不明原因的人看到就乱入局势说这说那，有些抱不平的人也会乱入。原来本来就发泄过一番被炸毛的人看到又有人在说这件事就会继续闹下去。真要自然冷下去，要等好长一段时间。

我希望贵吧那个九级的人能出来说明一下为什么在这里装中立却在事象吧编造和实际情况相去甚远的言论来误导他人，还有那个行剑，和一个没有头像的人，通过不完整的截图来污蔑我和另一个人甚至指责设定控吧的人都是三观不正的人

我在事象吧还是发不了言，我也害怕贵吧的吧主或者那个吧务看我不爽把我直接拉黑，所以我个人希望楼主去帮我问问这些和整个事象吧没有关系的事

还有，为何贵吧吧主要把所有人不分青红皂白全部封掉，贵吧的吧务又为何要用无脑，吃翔这样的话语对所有人进行攻击呢

我们也没去你那胡闹，主要是个别奇人的谬语实在太过越耳。忍不住探讨下哲♂学而已。
又碰巧，乃们作者出来的时机不太对。引发了一些个人之间的不愉快。
我等均对贵书及其书友无恶意。（或许是个人意见
ps：贴吧就是这样,烧年乃要淡定。不同文化间的交流往往伴随着不和谐事件的产生。只要能达成共识，那就是有意义的。
ps2：看样子已经到最后了，所以就这样吧。

The human rights included both economic, social and cultural rights and civil and political rights because it was based on the principle that the different rights could only successfully exist in combination:The ideal of free human beings enjoying civil and political freedom and freedom from fear and want can only be achieved if conditions are created whereby everyone may enjoy his civil and political rights, as well as his social, economic and cultural rights.—International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights, 1966This is held to be true because without civil and political rights the public cannot assert their economic, social and cultural rights. Similarly, without livelihoods and a working society, the public cannot assert or make use of civil or political rights (known as the full belly thesis).The indivisibility and interdependence of all human rights has been confirmed by the 1993 Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action:All human rights are universal, indivisible and interdependent and related. The international community must treat human rights globally in a fair and equal manner, on the same footing, and with the same emphasis.—Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, World Conference on Human Rights, 1993This statement was again endorsed at the 2005 World Summit in New York (paragraph 121).Although accepted by the signatories to the UDHR, most do not in practice give equal weight to the different types of rights. Some Western cultures have often given priority to civil and political rights, sometimes at the expense of economic and social rights such as the right to work, to education, health and housing. Similarly the ex Soviet bloc countries and Asian countries have tended to give priority to economic, social and cultural rights, but have often failed to provide civil and political rights.

s_wordfeng：那边还在战啊，但是对于进行人身攻击的我就无视了
咱坚持不首先进行人身攻击，人身攻击者无人权
还有人四处引战的，呵呵

无人权，呵呵，那什么时候来抄我家，禁锢我，夺我性命啊，要不要我爆地址来真人PK.
人身攻击就没人权，那问候你父母是不是要族诛、连坐。